Bishop Franco Mulakkal Moves SC Seeking Discharge From Nun-Rape Case

first_imgTop StoriesBishop Franco Mulakkal Moves SC Seeking Discharge From Nun-Rape Case LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK25 July 2020 7:13 AMShare This – xBishop Franco Mullakkal has approached the Supreme Court challenging the judgment of Kerala High Court rejecting his plea seeking discharge him from the rape case.In his Special Leave Petition filed through Advocate Anand Mishra, he repeats his contention he is innocent and that he was falsely implicated after he questioned the financial dealings of the victim nun.The former Bishop of…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginBishop Franco Mullakkal has approached the Supreme Court challenging the judgment of Kerala High Court rejecting his plea seeking discharge him from the rape case.In his Special Leave Petition filed through Advocate Anand Mishra, he repeats his contention he is innocent and that he was falsely implicated after he questioned the financial dealings of the victim nun.The former Bishop of Jalandhar diocese of Roman Catholic Church is accused of raping a nun on multiple occasions by abusing his dominant position. Allegations surfaced for the first time in July 2018 when a collective called “Save Our Sisters” launched public protests calling for arrest of Franco. Later, the Special Investigation Team of Kerala police submitted the charge-sheet against him for offences punishable under Sections 342, 376 (2)(k) and (n), 377, and 506 (I) IPC. In his discharge plea before the Trial Court, the priest argued that he was falsely implicated after he questioned the financial dealings of the victim nun. The Trial Court dismissed the plea.Challenging the Trial Court order, he approached the High Court by filing a Revision Petition. The High Court, while dismissing his plea, observed that there are prima facie materials are available to show that the Sister was subjected to sexual assault including rape by him. “It is not possible to infer that this Bishop/petitioner was falsely implicated by the Mother Superior of the Home functioning under him, on mere enmity as contended by him. The prosecution has produced the chronicle/ record maintained in the Home indicating his stay in the Home on the relevant dates during his visits.”, Justice Shircy V. had observed in her judgment dismissing the Revision Petition.   Next Storylast_img read more

admin